Skip to Content

Why was the Book of Common Prayer so controversial?


The Book of Common Prayer is a liturgical text used by many Anglican communities that contains the orders of Christian worship, including prayers, psalms, creeds, and biblical texts. However, this book has not been without controversy, with some critics describing it as a dangerous innovation that challenges traditional Christian beliefs. In this post, we will explore the reasons why the Book of Common Prayer has been so controversial.

The Background of the Book of Common Prayer

The Book of Common Prayer was first developed in the 16th century during the English Reformation. It was designed to replace the mishmash of liturgical books used by the clergy and to standardize the form of worship throughout the Church of England. Its origins can be traced back to the 1549 Act of Uniformity, which required the use of a single book for all public worship services.

One of the key figures behind the development of the Book of Common Prayer was Thomas Cranmer, Archbishop of Canterbury. Cranmer believed that the liturgy should be easily understandable and accessible to the common people, and that the text of the Bible should be at the centre of worship. In developing the Book of Common Prayer, he drew heavily on the Sarum Rite, a set of liturgical books used in Salisbury, and other sources.

The Key Controversies Surrounding the Book of Common Prayer

1. The Use of English

One of the most controversial aspects of the Book of Common Prayer was the use of the English language in worship services. At the time, Latin was widely used in religious services, and some conservative members of the Church of England believed that using the vernacular language was a dangerous innovation that would undermine traditional Christian beliefs and practices.

However, the use of English was also seen as an opportunity to make the liturgy more accessible to the common people, many of whom were illiterate and had little understanding of Latin. Cranmer believed that the use of vernacular language would help the congregation to engage more fully with the text and understand the meaning of the prayers.

2. The Role of the Church

Another key controversy surrounding the Book of Common Prayer was the role of the Church in the liturgy. At the time, the Roman Catholic Church believed that the bread and wine used in Communion were literally transformed into the body and blood of Christ in a process known as transubstantiation. However, the Book of Common Prayer promoted the belief that the success of Communion depended more upon the receptive heart of the Christian participant than the actual bread and wine used. This and other aspects of the Book put it at the centre of a storm of controversy.

3. The Break with Tradition

Some Christians believed that the Book of Common Prayer represented a break with traditional Christian practices and beliefs. For example, the Book of Common Prayer made significant changes to the Christian calendar, removing many traditional feast and saints’ days. This was seen by some conservatives as a deliberate attempt to simplify and dumb down the Christian faith.

Similarly, the Book of Common Prayer removed many Catholic elements from the worship service, such as the use of candles and incense. This was seen as an attempt to align the Church of England more closely with Protestant practices.

The Legacy of the Book of Common Prayer

Despite its controversial origins and history, the Book of Common Prayer has had a lasting impact on Anglican worship and liturgy. It has helped to standardize the form of worship throughout the Church of England and has served as a model for liturgical texts in other parts of the Anglican Communion.

In addition, the Book of Common Prayer has had a significant cultural impact, inspiring literary works such as the poetry of John Donne, and shaping the English language itself. Many of the phrases used in the Book of Common Prayer have become a part of the English language, such as “ashes to ashes, dust to dust”, which is used at funerals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Book of Common Prayer has been controversial throughout its history due to its promotion of English language in worship services and its challenge to traditional Christian beliefs and practices. However, the book has had a lasting impact on Anglican liturgy and has helped to shape the English language and culture. Today, the Book of Common Prayer remains an important part of Anglican worship and history.

FAQ

Who did Tertullian write against?


Tertullian, a prominent early Christian author and theologian, was born around 150 AD in Carthage, a city located in modern-day Tunisia. He is considered to be one of the three great early Church Fathers from Northern Africa, alongside St. Augustine and St. Cyprian.

Tertullian was known for his passionate defense of orthodox Christian beliefs and his strong resistance to what he saw as heretical teachings. He wrote extensively against various groups that he deemed to be outside the bounds of orthodox Christianity, including Gnostics, Marcionites, and Montanists.

Gnostics were a group of early Christians who believed in the existence of secret knowledge (gnosis) that was necessary for salvation. They believed in a dualistic view of the universe, with the material world being evil and the spiritual world being good. Tertullian vehemently opposed such beliefs and wrote a number of treatises, such as “Against the Valentinians” and “Against the Marcionites,” attacking Gnostic teachings.

Marcion was a 2nd-century Christian leader who rejected the Old Testament and believed that the God of the Old Testament was different from the God of the New Testament. Tertullian wrote his most famous work, “Against Marcion,” in response to Marcion’s teachings and argued forcefully for the unity of the Old and New Testaments.

Montanism was a Christian sect that emerged in the 2nd century and placed emphasis on prophecy and the authority of the Holy Spirit. They believed that they were living in the end times and that the second coming of Christ was imminent. Tertullian was initially sympathetic to Montanist teachings but later opposed them, writing a treatise titled “Against the Montanists.”

In addition to his polemical writings, Tertullian also made significant contributions to Christian theology, particularly with his development of the doctrine of the Trinity. He is also known for his defense of Christian martyrdom and for his influential writings on moral and ethical issues.

Tertullian wrote against a number of groups that he believed were outside the bounds of orthodox Christianity, including Gnostics, Marcionites, and Montanists. His writings played a major role in shaping Christian theology in the early centuries of the Church.