Skip to Content

What was the vote for the right to marriage Act?


On November 4, 2014, history was made as the Respect for Marriage Act was passed by the US Senate by a vote of 61-36. This legislation was spearheaded by senators Tammy Baldwin and Susan Collins and was aimed at preventing discrimination, promoting equality, and protecting the rights of all Americans.

The Respect for Marriage Act is a significant piece of legislation that seeks to address the issue of same-sex marriage in the US. It was designed to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which was passed in 1996 and defined marriage as a legal union only between one man and one woman.

This act effectively prevented same-sex couples from receiving federal benefits and recognition, even if they were legally married in their respective states. The DOMA was widely viewed as discriminatory, and it was subject to numerous legal challenges over the years.

The Respect for Marriage Act was passed to overturn this decision, allowing same-sex couples to legally marry and provide them with the same rights and protections that opposite-sex couples have long enjoyed.

The vote for the Respect for Marriage Act was critically important and was widely viewed as a watershed moment for the LGBT community in the United States. The passing of this legislation was celebrated nationwide by the LGBT community and their allies as it marked a significant victory for the cause of equality and human rights.

Opponents of the Respect for Marriage Act argued that it would undermine the sanctity of traditional marriage and promote a so-called “gay agenda.” These arguments were widely viewed as unfounded, and the act went on to enjoy broad support from a range of different groups, including human rights organizations, legal scholars, LGBTQ advocates, and religious organizations.

The passage of the Respect for Marriage Act was a significant achievement that represents a long overdue victory for the LGBTQ community in the United States. The act has brought forth a range of legal and social benefits for same-sex couples, including the right to file joint federal tax returns, access social security survivor benefits, and the ability to sponsor a foreign partner for residency in the United States.

The right to marry and enjoy the same legal status, benefits, and recognition as their heterosexual counterparts is a fundamental human right, and the passage of the Respect for Marriage Act was a significant step towards ensuring equal rights for all. It is important that we recognize the significant impact that this legislation has had, and continues to have, on the lives of millions of Americans.

In conclusion, the vote for the right to marriage act was a significant event in the history of the LGBTQ movement in the United States. The Respect for Marriage Act was designed to provide same-sex couples with the same legal rights and protections as opposite-sex couples, thereby promoting greater equality and opportunities for all. The passage of this legislation was met with widespread support and continues to be celebrated as a watershed moment for human rights in the U.S.

FAQ

How many votes did the U.S. Senate get for the Respect for Marriage Act?

On November 10, 2011, the U.S. Senate voted on the Respect for Marriage Act, which sought to federally recognize same-sex and interracial marriage rights for all Americans. The Senate voted 61-36 in favor of passing the act. This was a significant win for the LGBTQ+ community as the bill had been introduced multiple times before but had never passed.

The Respect for Marriage Act was introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein of California in 2011, in response to the Defense of Marriage Act, which defined marriage as between a man and a woman and prevented the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages. The Respect for Marriage Act aimed to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and allow the federal government to recognize same-sex and interracial marriages that were legally recognized by the states.

During the Senate vote on the Respect for Marriage Act, 61 senators voted in favor of the bill, while 36 voted against it. The senators who voted in favor of the bill included 51 Democrats, 7 Republicans, and 2 Independents. The senators who voted against the bill included 32 Republicans, 3 Democrats, and 1 Independent.

The passing of the Respect for Marriage Act was a significant milestone for the LGBTQ+ community as it demonstrated that lawmakers were increasingly in support of marriage equality. The act paved the way for the eventual repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, which happened two years later, in 2013, by the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark case of United States v. Windsor.

The U.S. Senate received 61 votes in favor of the Respect for Marriage Act and 36 votes against it on November 10, 2011.

Was the federal marriage amendment passed?


The Federal Marriage Amendment refers to a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution which sought to define marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman. In 2004, the proposed amendment read: “Marriage in the United States shall consist solely of the union of a man and a woman.” However, the Federal Marriage Amendment was never passed by the US Congress and therefore, was not added to the US Constitution.

Although the amendment passed in the House of Representatives, it was blocked in the Senate by a minority of Senators who opposed the amendment. On the first vote, the amendment failed to get the necessary two-thirds majority with a vote of 48 in favor and 50 opposed. A second vote in 2006 also failed to get the required two-thirds majority, with a vote of 49 in favor and 48 opposed.

The amendment was motivated by the growing movement in support of same-sex marriage at the time. The amendment aimed to protect traditional heterosexual marriage by amending the US Constitution to define marriage in traditional terms. However, opponents of the amendment argued that such an amendment would limit the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals and their pursuit of happiness.

The Federal Marriage Amendment was not passed and thus never became part of the US Constitution. The amendment faced opposition from those who believed it violated the civil rights of LGBTQ+ individuals. Furthermore, the amendment did not receive the required two-thirds majority vote in the Senate.

How do I find out how my representative voted?


If you want to know how your representative voted on a particular bill or issue, there are a few ways to find out. One method is to access votes using Congress.gov, which is the official website for U.S. federal legislative information.

To use Congress.gov to find out how your representative voted, you need to first search for the bill in question by using the search bar on the homepage. Once you’ve located the bill, click on the “Actions” tab to see the history of the bill and any votes that were taken on it.

If there was a roll call vote on the bill, a specific link to the House or Senate’s web page will appear beside the vote result. You can click on this link to view a tally of how each representative voted in the House of Representatives or the Senate.

Keep in mind that the Congressional Record is the official source of information on recorded floor votes. This resource provides the transcripts of the debates and proceedings for both houses of Congress. You can access the Congressional Record on Congress.gov to review the records of your representative’s votes as well as the votes of other members of Congress.

Another way to find out how your representative voted is through their website or social media profiles. Many representatives will publicly announce their vote, particularly on controversial or high-profile issues, so they can communicate their position to their constituents.

There are several ways to find out how your representative voted, whether you use Congress.gov, the Congressional Record, or check their website or social media profiles. By keeping an eye on how your representative is voting, you can stay informed about the issues and hold them accountable for their decisions.